The facts
Across the 27–28 October plenary sessions, legislators considered ten amendment proposals concerning nine articles and a proposed new article. [2]
Five proposals were rejected; the remainder were withdrawn or left on record. With no text changes, the Chamber said reconciliation with the Senate was unnecessary. [1][2]
Chamber president Nicolás Bargui said the legislature had complied with the court’s order. That is the Chamber’s position, not a final judicial finding. [1]
Still unconfirmed
- The Constitutional Court’s final assessment and the resulting implementation timetable.
Sources
References support the numbered facts above. Source checks: 29 Oct 2026, 04:19 UTC.
- Plenaria de la Cámara subsanó los vicios de trámite en la Reforma Pensional
Colombia Chamber of Representatives · Primary source · 28 Oct 2026
Full Chamber account read through normal public HTTPS. Its claim to have cured the defects is attributed, not treated as the court’s conclusion.
- Cámara de Representantes subsanó trámite de la reforma pensional sin modificar el texto
La FM / RCN Radio · Reporting · 28 Oct 2026
Camilo Portocarrero’s separately owned report confirms the unchanged text and remaining Constitutional Court review.