The facts

  1. Judge Darrin P. Gayles dismissed the claims with prejudice, barring their refiling in that court, after an earlier dismissal allowed Trump to amend his complaint. [1][2]

  2. The suit concerned the Journal’s July 2025 report about a 2003 birthday letter attributed to Trump. Trump denies writing or signing it. [1]

  3. The judge said the complaint did not sufficiently allege knowing falsehood or reckless disregard for truth. The order explicitly declined to decide whether the reporting was true or the letter authentic. [1]

  4. The court retained jurisdiction over fees and costs and allowed a fee motion within thirty days; it did not award fees in this order. [1]

Relevant context

Reuters reports that Trump sought at least US$10 billion in damages. [2]

Still unconfirmed

  • Any appeal and any subsequent award of attorneys’ fees remain unresolved.

Sources

References support the numbered facts above. Source checks: 1 Nov 2026, 04:39 UTC.

  1. Trump v. Dow Jones and others, No. 1:25-cv-23232: Document 80

    US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, via CourtListener · Primary source · 31 Oct 2026

    The judicial opinion, treatment of disputed authenticity and final operative order were read.

  2. Judge ends Trump’s attempts to sue Wall Street Journal over Epstein reporting

    Reuters, via MarketScreener · Reporting · 31 Oct 2026

Report a factual error